{"id":"W7110879631","doi":"10.1080/07011784.2025.2543860","title":"Water quality and property values: A meta-analysis and Canadian national benefit assessment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Quality (philosophy); Water quality; Water pollution; Work (physics); Legislation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02077885,0.00130092,0.004170791,0.004986595,0.0009136168,0.002687658,0.0018385,0.001291119,0.002852412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04796881,0.0005856663,0.01771552,0.009550839,0.0009190539,0.0008494584,0.00135459,0.001549198,0.0001171147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007636574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008798612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4428889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5286021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909417,0.004039314,0.001327853,0.001420965,0.001890124,0.0003800724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701785,0.02056204,0.003088739,0.002219785,0.003422267,0.0005286011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002987289,0.00003218559,0.1157457,0.04946543,0.762124,0.0002535253,0.0002602092,0.003336353,0.0002543569,0.001950344,0.0050514,0.05853923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000683833,0.0001546441,0.08988531,0.01090921,0.8843936,0.0001709932,0.0001469392,0.0015062,0.0001719034,0.002072097,0.009841863,0.00006342877],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04952388,0.9347408,0.003460329,0.00244585,0.000270265,0.0002165795,0.006692335,0.00006004591,0.002589848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7950262,0.1947315,0.004296465,0.001443577,0.0001784648,0.0002915977,0.003450049,0.00005947887,0.0005226511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5571111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.880622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.117702826657068,"score_gpt":0.2528158100848311,"score_spread":0.1351129834277631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}