{"id":"W7113640193","doi":"","title":"Do You Know Who You’re Talking To? Methodological Reflections on Maintaining Inclusivity and Research Integrity When Responding to Inauthentic Encounters in Online Qualitative Research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. George's, University of London; La Trobe University; University of Leeds; McMaster University; University of Otago","keywords":"Qualitative research; Harm; Context (archaeology); Suspect; Research integrity; Inclusion (mineral); Quality (philosophy); Scientific integrity; Research ethics; Reactionary","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02414123,0.0002597732,0.0005693731,0.00205961,0.004997011,0.0001044068,0.001334962,0.0003666486,0.0000696839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003424294,0.0002806694,0.0001850083,0.003748621,0.005236197,0.000563216,0.000876107,0.002071439,0.000007030804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001556791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001741653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01754859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01600364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9855491,0.01090551,0.0004020091,0.000922858,0.001508331,0.0007121781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924755,0.005113316,0.0002126369,0.0004949601,0.001382268,0.0003213125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001236475,0.0003684792,0.0009373571,0.00006579992,0.00009797598,0.0001294258,0.3201662,0.0002958208,0.006424778,0.6666464,0.000173931,0.003457356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063934,0.0007451274,0.02405487,0.001169976,0.00003762276,0.000004598033,0.9272132,0.00008415739,0.0003807723,0.03862059,0.006775305,0.0002744696],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9241185,0.0001024271,0.01245291,0.008012509,0.0002019823,0.0008544956,0.00009789136,0.0000388542,0.05412038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714869,0.0001260759,0.02473284,0.000040583,0.00005783411,8.501798e-7,0.000005519149,0.000007668163,0.003541773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6280258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3466791849334803,"score_gpt":0.5389135994867567,"score_spread":0.1922344145532764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}