{"id":"W7116352451","doi":"10.70148/v3i2.5","title":"Environmental Ethics In Socio-Humanities Research: A Hybrid Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"ms","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research Innovation and Strategies for Education (RISE)","topic":"Religion, Ecology, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Research ethics; Process (computing); Systematic review; Conceptual framework; Theme (computing); Environmental studies; Information ethics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07369427,0.001504463,0.007719864,0.2463705,0.003611712,0.0115291,0.002437325,0.002306875,0.006291827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1363798,0.001745914,0.006069808,0.2041796,0.002799328,0.008782824,0.009178564,0.0007481367,0.0008347717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01031329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03619752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00654157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01575871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8819479,0.06080752,0.02723237,0.005286342,0.02294493,0.001780798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8720447,0.09438117,0.00975302,0.0053115,0.01745312,0.001056466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003504965,0.0003832772,0.02843104,0.3914388,0.008010759,0.00129224,0.02983588,0.001841921,0.002315178,0.02145353,0.0103842,0.5042628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001371884,0.001747382,0.1028806,0.4083444,0.04993117,0.003402469,0.134122,0.01291137,0.004618137,0.04270704,0.2370165,0.000947066],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2411169,0.3534326,0.1849117,0.01316777,0.001340335,0.1235776,0.03876392,0.001996118,0.04169298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3901947,0.1067983,0.3907517,0.00190491,0.0004261697,0.0984362,0.009021968,0.0002108217,0.002255231],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7536294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3897372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2134376455454569,"score_gpt":0.5193870836612506,"score_spread":0.3059494381157938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}