{"id":"W7117345110","doi":"","title":"Designing ecologically effective and economically efficient conservation compensation funds: lessons from theory and practice","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Investment (military); Variety (cybernetics); Biodiversity; Scale (ratio); Payment; Biodiversity conservation","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008700754,0.0007396099,0.000760183,0.000131563,0.0007802323,0.0004440291,0.0006098547,0.0006090144,0.01120573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003125041,0.0008365498,0.0001744462,0.0001700634,0.001348165,0.0004435214,0.005316727,0.0009494011,0.004420741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00121929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009098222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001281658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002545966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905902,0.004292935,0.001034952,0.003121044,0.0004236317,0.0005372179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876984,0.009740697,0.0009640852,0.001241703,0.00005082092,0.0003043178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007879606,0.00450406,0.2276583,0.001327824,0.004609079,0.0001089236,0.02437617,0.1810644,0.06185324,0.2026036,0.005964216,0.2780505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002611463,0.00007358509,0.8827903,0.0005076954,0.001284742,0.0000127076,0.005723108,0.03540205,0.002248815,0.0459347,0.02189709,0.001513693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7723892,0.0001740758,0.1269507,0.01951461,0.0007426025,0.006761012,0.0001895926,0.0001719896,0.07310625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964734,0.001975949,0.01908305,0.009994481,0.00005335235,0.0006975336,0.0001279717,0.00004067445,0.00329297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.655132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02318361193770208,"score_gpt":0.2709007798875689,"score_spread":0.2477171679498668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}