{"id":"W7117718888","doi":"10.3917/nrt.353.0481e","title":"Daniel W.L. (éd.), Ministerium justitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, coll. Gratianus - Section Research Tools, Montréal, Wilson et Lafleur, 2011, 16x23, 776 p., rel., ISBN 978-2-89127-890-4","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Nouvelle revue théologique","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Tribunal; Supreme court; Mistake","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00173745,0.00193361,0.001021525,0.003908872,0.002186526,0.005241158,0.001433758,0.003368197,0.02315754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003037648,0.00113282,0.0005203729,0.0055673,0.001569284,0.008117357,0.00159076,0.003542493,0.02331985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002860299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005227544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0320379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08590229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990451,0.0002044932,0.00009097569,0.000115931,0.0004666966,0.00007678652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989046,0.0005317186,0.0001355344,0.00003414572,0.0002689146,0.0001251808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002469181,0.00001275202,0.0001805226,0.0007638235,0.0000084744,0.00005392868,0.00085372,0.00009533564,0.00007742576,0.009096435,0.8424735,0.1463594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005640335,0.000005089775,0.00060904,0.001464798,0.000007416259,0.0001577501,0.0005443047,0.0000525804,0.0000791128,0.004101098,0.9929624,0.00001078901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001221032,0.9654822,0.0004271436,0.01513516,0.004142172,0.000006115883,0.0001516026,0.00004175292,0.01449171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002937256,0.9583194,0.0008766729,0.002118997,0.002293312,0.00002323135,0.000189478,0.00004270365,0.03319895],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0320379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07746971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04858776574068981,"score_gpt":0.2667192874335433,"score_spread":0.2181315216928535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}