{"id":"W7117718888","doi":"10.3917/nrt.353.0481e","title":"Daniel W.L. (éd.), Ministerium justitiae. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, coll. Gratianus - Section Research Tools, Montréal, Wilson et Lafleur, 2011, 16x23, 776 p., rel., ISBN 978-2-89127-890-4","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Nouvelle revue théologique","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Tribunal; Supreme court; Mistake","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002715509,0.0007528247,0.001361287,0.0002204281,0.002249754,0.0002454902,0.0020303,0.001050503,0.00179371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009300314,0.0004839019,0.0006993926,0.0004644494,0.004644614,0.0005816452,0.001442699,0.002638541,0.0001339099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002192104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00107316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006462736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009183152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916281,0.003788579,0.001630132,0.0009509883,0.0008371381,0.001165132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932305,0.001982483,0.001235109,0.001807916,0.001597552,0.0001464059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001402794,0.001741423,0.001277337,0.002288282,0.0008482187,0.00003347973,0.04089934,0.0002473571,0.01453877,0.2479192,0.6866106,0.002193117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002879363,0.004832036,0.02132092,0.002817786,0.0008815207,0.0003108113,0.0461753,0.0004135432,0.03314839,0.009002932,0.8764277,0.001789675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.82713,0.04019573,0.00009322795,0.0571157,0.009437148,0.007049798,0.001379252,0.0002100159,0.05738911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9173538,0.01794422,0.00005713185,0.0006268786,0.0007687414,0.0003713808,0.00001885231,0.00008294549,0.06277602],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2389163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04858776574068981,"score_gpt":0.2667192874335433,"score_spread":0.2181315216928535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}