{"id":"W7120878868","doi":"","title":"Novos táxons e notas sobre Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) da Costa Rica","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova (rocket); New guinea; Nova scotia; Natural (archaeology)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003069824,0.0002686915,0.000179732,0.001570643,0.0008315805,0.000284065,0.0002697061,0.0001852711,0.002958887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006729336,0.0001194167,0.0001281143,0.001764162,0.0003023758,0.0003172625,0.0004322155,0.0002122028,0.0003024081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005513353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000721327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0637392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2811941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998543,0.00003390872,0.00001506932,0.00002822491,0.0000465999,0.00002189825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993862,0.0001153589,0.0002338392,0.00006200288,0.0001503646,0.00005219076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001682211,0.0000701642,0.7037001,0.001562017,0.00008290228,0.0009854861,0.01701346,0.0001783735,0.01529489,0.00163602,0.007218226,0.2520901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002890999,0.00004293686,0.9560345,0.0002443637,0.00004176899,0.0005859878,0.002378594,0.00006030283,0.0004456642,0.0001100313,0.04004623,0.000006731942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9216792,0.0164505,0.0005487863,0.000395038,0.00007106097,0.0001041831,0.00271918,0.00005030896,0.05798166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656682,0.01739598,0.003273186,0.0003404865,0.00009753073,0.0001509071,0.001920467,0.00001516088,0.01113806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0637392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1267363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02400159220686966,"score_gpt":0.2338681558554473,"score_spread":0.2098665636485776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}