{"id":"W7123773215","doi":"10.36939/ir.202601131603","title":"Environmental DNA as a tool to supplement sampling for fish community monitoring","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Sampling (signal processing); Catch per unit effort; Biomass (ecology); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Spring (device)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003600669,0.0007002652,0.0004888722,0.004248672,0.0005787023,0.001186694,0.00115364,0.0008296402,0.002406414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006150785,0.0005040378,0.0002876327,0.003057123,0.0005802463,0.0008609606,0.001197131,0.0006400772,0.001215022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008063379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001922927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01461327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06336205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967698,0.001027119,0.0002698386,0.0006607625,0.001158873,0.0001135535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948331,0.001024815,0.001237551,0.0005331204,0.002079075,0.0002923608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002263491,0.0002039589,0.6535371,0.0009832047,0.0002472975,0.0004269777,0.00174918,0.001600418,0.1214108,0.002311028,0.00375104,0.2135527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006213946,0.001533241,0.7783199,0.000886993,0.0003443303,0.001217816,0.004318328,0.009591884,0.09015618,0.003074855,0.1103573,0.0001370605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7877042,0.005042238,0.1523639,0.002463629,0.0009033203,0.001734365,0.02450523,0.0007282185,0.02455496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5093172,0.005044325,0.445817,0.002255036,0.0002321631,0.001449243,0.01118973,0.0001589617,0.02453642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01461327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02905643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03156763224674047,"score_gpt":0.2809334978579395,"score_spread":0.2493658656111991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}