{"id":"W7124176716","doi":"10.65109/hjey6402","title":"Empirical analysis of plurality election equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Voting; Social choice theory; Aggregate (composite); Equilibrium selection; Simple (philosophy); Approval voting; Best response","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01028153,0.0004500946,0.001568968,0.001977288,0.001479968,0.002394682,0.001565564,0.00130391,0.01537487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07457144,0.0003683469,0.0007874671,0.001932886,0.001608993,0.003016492,0.001529011,0.002578367,0.001047677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001455934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006145791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001936935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001816696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995364,0.002662493,0.0002269186,0.0006337615,0.0006349515,0.0004779444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9374622,0.04588659,0.008114107,0.004605195,0.002836918,0.001094928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008499757,0.0007625321,0.1201426,0.0005196393,0.0005708552,0.0009302284,0.001903892,0.06604604,0.00152671,0.7208642,0.01313509,0.07274815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002713203,0.0002883521,0.04999527,0.0001825177,0.0001442953,0.0006444443,0.001825371,0.3437564,0.00145034,0.5877935,0.01355235,0.00009585215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8652024,0.001891878,0.09361409,0.002995345,0.00006264573,0.0002951195,0.001221516,0.0001604829,0.03455646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940639,0.000207149,0.003039841,0.00006877528,0.00003513963,0.00007128916,0.0003801547,0.00001797237,0.002115697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01537487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05437458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0533208407624723,"score_gpt":0.276846171033072,"score_spread":0.2235253302705997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}