{"id":"W7124176716","doi":"10.65109/hjey6402","title":"Empirical analysis of plurality election equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Voting; Social choice theory; Aggregate (composite); Equilibrium selection; Simple (philosophy); Approval voting; Best response","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00163659,0.0002403273,0.00131492,0.0008887299,0.00009262981,0.0001313012,0.0002988613,0.00027551,0.02073259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002434658,0.0002653465,0.0007351906,0.002526634,0.0001335039,0.0004279355,0.00008512365,0.0001937314,0.00182059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002403449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003318436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007693197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968345,0.0001472376,0.001900391,0.0006137016,0.00005989941,0.0004442843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978185,0.0002314709,0.001014818,0.0006585352,0.0001237542,0.0001529075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002899465,0.0002969159,0.8670698,0.0001042525,0.003228355,2.861836e-7,0.000843215,0.0003798581,0.0003632342,0.1250227,0.001823211,0.0008391195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004267832,0.000215879,0.7741257,0.00001853785,0.0005496931,0.000001428061,0.0002992203,0.1952684,0.0005148649,0.02423989,0.003842595,0.0004970247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9415862,0.0005692939,0.005491693,0.0006030319,0.0007096831,0.0003289935,0.00006295226,0.00003567662,0.05061246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876351,0.00004585583,0.0001367519,0.0001416433,0.0001163279,0.00001713999,0.00001864814,0.00001752022,0.01187096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1948885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0533208407624723,"score_gpt":0.276846171033072,"score_spread":0.2235253302705997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}