{"id":"W7124828854","doi":"10.22215/etd/2025-16699","title":"\"If we didn't know what happened, you wouldn't be sitting in that chair\": Communicative Purposes and Rhetorical Actions in Canadian Police Suspect Interviews","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Rhetorical question; Sitting; Derogation; Discourse analysis; Position (finance); Rhetoric","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0156835,0.00101031,0.0007173031,0.005764191,0.07323762,0.01556661,0.002647846,0.00530148,0.004293377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04642183,0.001177692,0.0005004651,0.007092777,0.02971987,0.006314822,0.00704319,0.01002726,0.0005661112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1054111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1528341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9679056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9824938,0.009118983,0.0004926205,0.000979782,0.003512077,0.003402732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750982,0.01591182,0.001348411,0.0004036935,0.005737753,0.001500129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001507348,0.000006136341,0.0008746696,0.00003221784,0.000001460549,0.0002128098,0.9833177,0.00003598649,0.0002450825,0.01152123,0.002016723,0.001720872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003389633,0.000005147559,0.002085631,0.0001181566,0.000009367417,0.0001031582,0.9639004,0.0001111324,0.0003581765,0.000893656,0.03238579,0.00002596166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7144485,0.001939252,0.005034372,0.04726323,0.0004704119,0.0003220356,0.0006545816,0.0001029699,0.2297646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821923,0.0007730101,0.001133265,0.001240514,0.00002607108,0.0001036136,0.00008052999,0.00007865236,0.01437191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1054111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7648143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1109569280944215,"score_gpt":0.3628409746074382,"score_spread":0.2518840465130167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}