{"id":"W7127649151","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.3106","title":"Quantitative flow ratio in predicting residual angina: is it better than the eye?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Heart Journal","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Concordance; Conventional PCI; Angina; Coronary artery disease; Coronary angiography; Canadian Cardiovascular Society; Fractional flow reserve; Stenosis; Angiography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003402485,0.000681003,0.0007047669,0.001640015,0.0002375906,0.001061572,0.0006791668,0.0009733764,0.002863276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008282146,0.0001902043,0.0005194333,0.0006774437,0.0004921641,0.000860366,0.0003356542,0.0006132647,0.0005395259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002906659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002581986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001151076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00114088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998754,0.0004489776,0.0001549295,0.0002397742,0.0002769119,0.0001253268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945856,0.002194472,0.001756879,0.0002849183,0.0007374377,0.000440757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007504267,0.00004710296,0.9890022,0.00003709012,0.00009708077,0.0000992728,0.00002535115,0.000143995,0.000616507,0.00004506889,0.0002622288,0.008873597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007893044,0.0009159637,0.9884908,0.00008760815,0.0002682457,0.002299388,0.0001603842,0.005202769,0.001159694,0.0004245293,0.0008780154,0.0000336809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885025,0.004976035,0.002104065,0.0007508348,0.0001441843,0.00003500762,0.0004264742,0.00005127666,0.003009571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981464,0.0003060512,0.0009248297,0.00009048003,0.0001503448,0.000009029008,0.0001441685,0.000005986347,0.0002226109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003402485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01799428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0551158453853575,"score_gpt":0.3608753670678972,"score_spread":0.3057595216825397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}