{"id":"W7131254524","doi":"10.25675/3.026156","title":"Understanding the International Joint Commission: a comparative case study approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Politics; Water diversion; Joint (building); Reputation; Boundary (topology); Unit (ring theory); Government (linguistics); Comparative case","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02572408,0.0007655406,0.0009510625,0.01257981,0.01635019,0.02321129,0.00319197,0.008316176,0.008866724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03690908,0.0006923011,0.0007650714,0.02513003,0.01835098,0.02583641,0.007358156,0.004135786,0.0005482548],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03312914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01099136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04820563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06383912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.958934,0.03352433,0.0009441358,0.000898374,0.002882594,0.002816576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602006,0.03255356,0.002058327,0.001240301,0.00295886,0.0009883919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004751619,0.0001653525,0.003440071,0.0003885309,0.00002187929,0.002138237,0.1874146,0.001386154,0.0001035348,0.780156,0.007475296,0.01726288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002227275,0.0001000484,0.003619184,0.001714374,0.00003687136,0.0008210895,0.6623428,0.002002985,0.0002683573,0.06700233,0.2620212,0.00004851102],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1807741,0.02274495,0.02690994,0.02275021,0.0005304894,0.0009327229,0.0005935553,0.00004133448,0.7447228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527844,0.01395227,0.01505996,0.0015414,0.0001401019,0.0008341684,0.0002998076,0.00005907368,0.01532886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9668708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2403699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5201264661221318,"score_gpt":0.4251746005939891,"score_spread":0.09495186552814261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}