{"id":"W7136195860","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.4440365.v1","title":"Additional file 1: of Rationale, design, and methods for Canadian alliance for healthy hearts and minds cohort study (CAHHM) â a Pan Canadian cohort study","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohort study; Alliance; Cohort; Epidemiology; Qualitative research; Retrospective cohort study","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01006206,0.001784445,0.002035857,0.003084739,0.00382075,0.002166205,0.003023593,0.00188127,0.7037804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09521622,0.001610117,0.001661984,0.004856433,0.0009238969,0.001875899,0.001065852,0.001971031,0.07539819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003561118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01059683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09357467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1454003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966862,0.001095434,0.0005807091,0.0007369451,0.0005423414,0.0003582848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9469854,0.03412095,0.002590591,0.00579765,0.008588403,0.001917014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001004875,0.0001672583,0.004188812,0.001978202,0.0001183916,0.00005500806,0.0002047731,0.0002545865,0.00005354356,0.001411064,0.9823772,0.008186206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02658463,0.001080433,0.0589829,0.01330273,0.001452599,0.0007528756,0.001628924,0.002702569,0.0008721375,0.02189654,0.8702794,0.0004641788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006745682,0.00008755036,0.001974981,0.0003975632,0.0002047517,0.005560001,0.9881073,0.0001880874,0.002805165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03917722,0.0008803713,0.03367648,0.005285508,0.0009968238,0.2251156,0.6367404,0.00148901,0.05663848],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9064254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4225213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05572949125604253,"score_gpt":0.3239743947589067,"score_spread":0.2682449035028642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}