{"id":"W7147116020","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v30i2.2915","title":"Revisiting the judicial role in the allocation of healthcare resources: on deference, democratic dialogue and deliberation","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Health care; Deliberative democracy; Judicial review; Function (biology); Value (mathematics)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01443034,0.0001937294,0.0003101747,0.0001840245,0.004213507,0.0007639553,0.001467567,0.0001571235,0.00001878169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004957626,0.0001119012,0.0001183596,0.00182885,0.002552282,0.0007975078,0.0001103604,0.0008867467,0.000006960363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003442378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001025248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004485213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008583584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994671,0.001050789,0.001024193,0.0004207133,0.00207721,0.0007560184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965711,0.001702541,0.000710682,0.0002772505,0.0004450943,0.0002933689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002448892,0.0002057808,0.002774253,0.00007681208,0.00001460213,0.000004722747,0.460911,0.0008923098,0.0006444992,0.1576194,0.000428063,0.3761837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004111279,0.004484969,0.08914308,0.004016805,0.0004511758,0.0001631628,0.1339684,0.0765381,0.001532786,0.2745681,0.4090304,0.001991688],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8404209,0.004683363,0.0006521667,0.1448298,0.0008063396,0.001333023,0.00001584287,0.00001378632,0.007244764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942477,0.0005290417,0.0005932311,0.001699189,0.002851074,0.0000219966,7.866334e-7,0.000008608333,0.00004833732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4086024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02895318730473439,"score_gpt":0.3448575097764517,"score_spread":0.3159043224717173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}