{"id":"W7154589036","doi":"10.1053/ajcd.2003.3201","title":"A REVIEW OF PATCH TESTING WITH PRESERVATIVES AT ST. JOHN'S INSTITUTE OF DERMATOLOGY FROM 1995 TO 2000","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patch testing; Preservative; Patch test; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001832878,0.0001995715,0.0009371183,0.000121353,0.00005521004,0.00001019141,0.0002935479,0.00002242142,0.0002328306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001065769,0.0001565263,0.0001087935,0.0004324077,0.0002275718,0.0003357232,0.00005413678,0.0001897358,0.000007728488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006462276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002465378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001353367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005166949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980143,0.0003788799,0.0009219922,0.00015555,0.0003035256,0.0002257516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965885,0.0006802524,0.001844119,0.0002189625,0.0005153948,0.0001527919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001201962,0.0005409009,0.8892593,0.003628388,0.00156158,0.004022733,0.007440591,0.00005450403,0.02991522,0.0004526618,0.01267059,0.04925158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004333296,0.02384311,0.7040561,0.08744529,0.0007120564,0.02465887,0.003025018,0.0001645653,0.02357075,0.0004959032,0.1262678,0.00142724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886556,0.005991926,0.001407664,0.0006468683,0.00006907887,0.0001653315,0.00008191464,0.00001365842,0.002968012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704793,0.001110603,0.02734775,0.0009778313,0.00003376459,0.000005648784,0.000004062303,0.00002153494,0.00001949749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1852032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6382958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07396060716583895,"score_gpt":0.3447304396232151,"score_spread":0.2707698324573761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}