{"id":"W71561623","doi":"","title":"A strategic approach to judicial legitimacy: Supreme Court of Canada and the Marshall Case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006565731,0.0001400214,0.000284395,0.00004576198,0.001512393,0.0000630673,0.0002238715,0.00007364545,0.0000406782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003885518,0.0001078158,0.00006234284,0.0002559656,0.003513054,0.00008842848,0.00009006618,0.000202365,0.000003042021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006498783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002168043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7425453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9559174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987822,0.00009845161,0.0002767878,0.0002429196,0.0003026597,0.000297043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990851,0.0002883007,0.00009410913,0.0001510791,0.0002213248,0.0001601163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004124038,0.00004416802,0.0007193544,0.00001343697,0.00004847821,0.00005680486,0.001884491,0.00007701782,0.00005674767,0.9965205,0.0003596259,0.0001781132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008414347,0.0001937219,0.006811455,0.0005415133,0.0009641057,0.004536693,0.1809861,0.001491703,0.0002408661,0.4004208,0.3924724,0.002926257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.491708,0.000503968,0.0003164884,0.006209901,0.0007443586,0.0007913981,0.00008045584,0.00004037474,0.499605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985661,0.00009626566,0.0004864234,0.0002422638,0.0004538069,0.00004976095,0.000003213917,0.00000423356,0.00009791703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5960997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03383723725556665,"score_gpt":0.2559929142548845,"score_spread":0.2221556769993179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}