{"id":"W71561623","doi":"","title":"A strategic approach to judicial legitimacy: Supreme Court of Canada and the Marshall Case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005739551,0.0006069246,0.001203897,0.004788879,0.02788567,0.02302604,0.003722735,0.01207228,0.01021179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02175919,0.0006336397,0.0006975144,0.006252519,0.03894177,0.006782656,0.005356676,0.009216399,0.0004151171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1047146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2159037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9657077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9810492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897209,0.001767931,0.0001410376,0.0007244747,0.002599718,0.005045951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899982,0.004873375,0.0005643284,0.0004234149,0.002509004,0.001631584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001067056,0.00001159241,0.0006518178,0.000009729131,0.000007145939,0.000104012,0.002365964,0.0002721553,0.00003262018,0.9908481,0.003992544,0.0016937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001333541,0.00001809306,0.005521326,0.0001928034,0.0001005684,0.0001004556,0.01687333,0.002205979,0.0002920022,0.9078857,0.0665687,0.0001077066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1630592,0.005045402,0.003735925,0.1244658,0.0002608279,0.00008893306,0.0002474945,0.00004539645,0.7030511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818954,0.0008350268,0.0004847834,0.002712789,0.00009848023,0.00002677873,0.00002518485,0.00001980118,0.01390182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1047146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.759761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03383723725556665,"score_gpt":0.2559929142548845,"score_spread":0.2221556769993179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}