{"id":"W7161094860","doi":"","title":"Đánh giá độ phì nhiêu đất canh tác lúa trong và ngoài đê bao ngăn lũ ở nhóm đất có vấn đề của tỉnh An Giang","year":2021,"lang":"vi","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Research studies in Vietnam","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Southeast asia; Nova scotia; Socialist republic; South asia","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006082145,0.001670841,0.002929488,0.000967957,0.002706471,0.005541439,0.0117456,0.0006138697,0.1828748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002604544,0.001625537,0.001023221,0.004176882,0.002364387,0.009355169,0.012208,0.002900205,0.001379515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002403359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008073854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00851936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003930186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9825922,0.002796565,0.002977723,0.002944066,0.00531829,0.003371219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904584,0.0011546,0.002035313,0.003282495,0.000605997,0.002463235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005153446,0.002453596,0.4405944,0.0005185067,0.001638647,0.001970502,0.002768089,0.002363635,0.1989334,0.0001159709,0.2599051,0.08822279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002350421,0.0001666176,0.7813454,0.00153846,0.0004849172,0.0001696155,0.003060673,0.001050464,0.04900757,0.002452182,0.1557158,0.002657877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8023172,0.08936074,0.000391283,0.003437572,0.004571408,0.002931793,0.0007657632,0.0001741924,0.09605005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8919404,0.09096331,0.001239133,0.001378623,0.001465837,0.0002495991,0.00008998071,0.000346091,0.012327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.340751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.318014812724604,"score_gpt":0.6010785823896541,"score_spread":0.2830637696650501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}