{"id":"W7162189514","doi":"10.65521/ijeecs.v14i2.2109","title":"A Systematic Review of Hyperbolic PDE models for dynamo-type magnetic field behaviour: Methods, Architectures, and Future Research Directions","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Electrical Electronics and Computer Systems","topic":"Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamo; Field (mathematics); Stability (learning theory); Partial differential equation; Mathematical model; Hyperbolic partial differential equation; Transient (computer programming); Electromagnetic field; Computational model","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001944215,0.0003209457,0.0010703,0.0004788504,0.0001732321,0.0001383157,0.000609771,0.0002822359,0.000003270194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003417502,0.0002696878,0.0002896306,0.0004411115,0.0001161358,0.00001347577,0.000240335,0.0006045445,1.821407e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006844244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004864774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004648517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001929425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962876,0.0008382924,0.001422703,0.0004349144,0.0005248625,0.0004916713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960095,0.0007032309,0.0005921125,0.0002860208,0.002268067,0.000141121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003834479,0.002408217,0.0009649261,0.3920151,0.01445455,0.0001184178,0.00100391,0.0005520344,0.01530157,0.08934912,0.03117565,0.448822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01459253,0.1043055,0.001595631,0.3206228,0.01126712,0.01102271,0.0005538953,0.2487989,0.005423123,0.01979369,0.2582427,0.003781386],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004118174,0.9513277,0.03908665,0.002039836,0.002066688,0.001127778,0.00002331897,0.000004207786,0.0002056934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.225857,0.7675773,0.003975207,0.0004800723,0.001536186,0.00008460697,0.00001666339,0.00002830769,0.0004446853],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4450406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01203149674948661,"score_gpt":0.3333947792173841,"score_spread":0.3213632824678975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}