{"id":"W7164020984","doi":"10.62413/lc.2009(1).02","title":"Perspective lingvistico-pragmatice în abordarea textual-discursivă a referinței (considerații teoretice, retrospective şi de perspectivă) / Using Linguistic and Pragmatic Approaches in the Textual and Discursive Studies of Reference (Theory, Retrospectives and Prospectives)","year":2009,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Meaning (existential); Expression (computer science); Linguistic analysis; Linguistic description; Lexicology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004308992,0.0009607762,0.001996985,0.001302802,0.001153914,0.002186141,0.001310426,0.0002664828,0.0002928241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01570376,0.0007655774,0.0001440679,0.00249089,0.002461888,0.003486134,0.001324242,0.001213264,0.000002005203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007563723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002436138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000766966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002533373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945265,0.0008430384,0.001423603,0.001377098,0.001013536,0.0008162247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918773,0.002392324,0.002657583,0.0005566,0.002392836,0.0001234211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001120224,0.001153675,0.4170372,0.001343976,0.001082086,0.00008619582,0.07583225,0.00007135888,0.002230958,0.4989697,0.0002457392,0.0008265803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009433057,0.00008701893,0.5715645,0.001873416,0.0007399534,0.00003744334,0.1159639,0.000648774,0.0001910851,0.3073242,0.00002209191,0.0006043204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9035628,0.08050507,0.0009612383,0.001064634,0.0001881368,0.00271408,0.0001629709,0.00004443932,0.01079664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886326,0.009435775,0.000734359,0.0002660899,0.0007133373,0.00005419349,0.00001302047,0.00008412761,0.00006648535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1916455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2834736818905852,"score_gpt":0.508909880842246,"score_spread":0.2254361989516608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}