{"id":"W72657999","doi":"10.31274/rtd-180813-16480","title":"\"A solution to a worrisome problem\": the rhetoric of scientific discourse in a public policy dispute about the environment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Ethos; Construct (python library); Political science; Politics; Function (biology); Sociology; Epistemology; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Law; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03745709,0.000955077,0.0008268069,0.007297788,0.02006356,0.02516407,0.003148943,0.01089918,0.002944674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05725477,0.000636267,0.0007858629,0.003963398,0.08870038,0.0323366,0.01075881,0.01255756,0.0006157626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008472027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00850763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003855408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003305459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9592074,0.03372877,0.0006578739,0.001473624,0.003827221,0.001105196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.925186,0.06362199,0.00330748,0.0030756,0.003949542,0.0008593505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002579072,0.00001492102,0.0005646554,0.0001355411,0.000007824106,0.000231471,0.1917842,0.0001243755,0.0002761413,0.7932665,0.005127929,0.008440617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000401236,0.00005526737,0.0008243226,0.001362513,0.00003488117,0.0006771911,0.2669695,0.001470989,0.001362642,0.5447321,0.18241,0.00006053054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1160336,0.01322026,0.07286683,0.6036565,0.004369973,0.000148149,0.0001007788,0.0002988265,0.1893051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564739,0.002816565,0.01257042,0.01837201,0.002324777,0.0001807013,0.00003898112,0.0002069586,0.00701565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1980944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04318288938304206,"score_gpt":0.2803439947725639,"score_spread":0.2371611053895218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}