{"id":"W747909083","doi":"10.6067/xcv8571bhp","title":"POLLEN, STARCH, PHYTOLITH, PROTEIN RESIDUE, AND ORGANIC RESIDUE (FTIR) ANALYSIS OF ARTIFACTS FROM SITES HhOu 70, HhOu 94, HhOu 95, HhOv 378, HhOv 380, HhOv 381, HhOv 384, HhOv 385, HhOv 387, HhOv 431, AND HhOv 432, NORTHEASTERN ALBERTA, CANADA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Digital Archeological Record (tDAR)","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phytolith; Residue (chemistry); Starch; Chemistry; Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; Pollen; Food science; Botany; Biochemistry; Biology; Chemical engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001584493,0.002193104,0.003730427,0.0007259007,0.001437969,0.0004190976,0.003211889,0.0009896946,0.006931962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003168396,0.001685932,0.001005555,0.003855851,0.005172026,0.001421005,0.003727687,0.002077911,0.0005982023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001110033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006664562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2692898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7110931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9853162,0.001581118,0.003336529,0.003784613,0.002553511,0.003428084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989298,0.003731534,0.001750569,0.003252923,0.0002985288,0.001668422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002992001,0.001607598,0.9426826,0.0001374866,0.003793196,0.000893128,0.002821132,0.0008108513,0.0133261,0.000368111,0.005336573,0.02523117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003813289,0.002812908,0.931352,0.0002206441,0.002623512,0.0003100902,0.001851653,0.004174218,0.0117711,0.009313198,0.02759967,0.004157751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.982628,0.000906999,0.0002125892,0.003193295,0.0002823408,0.002260391,0.001036394,0.0002613667,0.009218588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832866,0.001061022,0.001445666,0.001394337,0.0002945337,0.0002801854,0.0007010233,0.0002415748,0.01129502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4418033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01296634053224035,"score_gpt":0.201118120683257,"score_spread":0.1881517801510166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}