{"id":"W74875765","doi":"10.3138/jcs.37.2.130","title":"Fumes, Forests and Further Studies: Environmental Science and Policy Inaction in Ontario","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental policy; Science policy; Scientific evidence; Public policy; Aside; Set-aside; Political science; Environmental ethics; Natural resource economics; Public administration; Economics; Law; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005884353,0.0000550557,0.0001596393,0.00219964,0.0007743177,0.00008944512,0.00007937964,0.00002840317,0.00005323797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003431798,0.00006004858,0.00001768963,0.0004101988,0.001804009,0.0004235214,0.00001958689,0.0001367681,0.000002985661],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01156139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001509925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991941,0.00003069167,0.0001595854,0.00008988167,0.0002849831,0.0002406915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999451,0.00003753945,0.00008962324,0.00003954363,0.00007306157,0.0003092616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001495905,0.00004219815,0.1785259,0.00002660222,0.0002109303,0.0003290353,0.6960301,0.000003159631,0.00005400773,0.006267618,0.04582783,0.07266766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002224394,0.00005513534,0.3003017,0.00003895577,0.00001587702,0.00002828195,0.08999603,7.699674e-7,8.487847e-7,0.000543089,0.6087128,0.00008409037],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582101,0.02696647,3.891777e-8,0.006890672,0.0002591794,0.0000609765,0.000002564222,0.000001434013,0.007608602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769774,0.02014815,0.0000184186,0.0002707333,0.0001296931,0.00000111143,2.42059e-8,0.000002974585,0.002451469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6060341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03898854952764931,"score_gpt":0.266463368960325,"score_spread":0.2274748194326757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}