{"id":"W763465268","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0504-3_101","title":"Evaluation of The Capture Efficiency for DNA in a Flow Through Device","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Chip; Lab-on-a-chip; Fluidics; Complementary DNA; Microfluidics; Yield (engineering); DNA; Flow (mathematics); Magnetic bead; Microfluidic chip; Materials science; Nanotechnology; Computer science; Chemistry; Chromatography; Engineering; Physics; Electrical engineering; Mechanics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007421754,0.00041651,0.0003390588,0.0003916018,0.0003033807,0.0003902276,0.0006341895,0.0006408188,0.0009992355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005857275,0.00023901,0.000274034,0.0005923155,0.0002841333,0.0005344628,0.0002787941,0.000341021,0.0004486529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006460906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002373101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001579722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001867466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996067,0.00005788192,0.00001902009,0.00008744888,0.0001627463,0.00006619912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996196,0.0001933279,0.00003071839,0.00003046798,0.0001063605,0.00001937071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007447664,0.00002688915,0.0001362231,0.00004114686,0.000007763908,0.00001697608,0.00003273123,0.0002181484,0.9961308,0.0001200967,0.00004307468,0.003151698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002218088,0.0001298745,0.0004123506,0.00000191144,0.000009744929,0.00002228568,0.000009853229,0.0009163324,0.9981199,0.00001349158,0.0003580632,0.000003881759],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560511,0.002923473,0.03503254,0.00007013453,0.00004657474,0.000143135,0.0003012184,0.0001775226,0.005254406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380947,0.002966424,0.04277408,0.00007962537,0.00001253952,0.0001372468,0.0007958503,0.0000802753,0.01505934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001579722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004687667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02612656042288288,"score_gpt":0.233820650867086,"score_spread":0.2076940904442031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}