{"id":"W771663504","doi":"","title":"Trust based on bias: Cognitive constraints on source-related fallacies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Cognitive bias; Cognition; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Cognitive science of religion; Spotting; Philosophy of science; Evolutionary psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001724269,0.0004277775,0.0004185875,0.0006509454,0.0001683508,0.00009811031,0.0003548855,0.0003051798,0.03930841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004601846,0.0004034506,0.000218156,0.000494044,0.000336057,0.0002115363,0.00009102291,0.0004980665,0.02945639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008979466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003481444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009526731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002407697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974918,0.0004298594,0.000304643,0.0008062482,0.0003280887,0.0006393078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984732,0.0003340417,0.0002086002,0.000568925,0.0001720612,0.0002431895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006158459,0.004881423,0.3559232,0.0002377226,0.002585765,0.004407568,0.02845707,0.00001168313,0.001444941,0.02214363,0.009157402,0.5645911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01239931,0.00108405,0.9340296,0.0005628318,0.000302458,0.0001012323,0.02738274,0.0007905762,0.0009774523,0.0003353448,0.02064873,0.001385615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5935192,0.000008044482,0.001359313,0.0001566076,0.0004095201,0.0004635302,0.00005168984,0.0001261832,0.403906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366543,0.000002380393,0.00006039617,0.001934262,0.0001168408,0.00001131908,0.00007960029,0.00004850794,0.06109242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5781065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02758750007136954,"score_gpt":0.2379653994436558,"score_spread":0.2103778993722862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}