{"id":"W771663504","doi":"","title":"Trust based on bias: Cognitive constraints on source-related fallacies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Cognitive bias; Cognition; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Cognitive science of religion; Spotting; Philosophy of science; Evolutionary psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0148508,0.0004542858,0.0007149983,0.001880492,0.002052678,0.006257016,0.001178691,0.002728603,0.003868327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1277356,0.0007197799,0.0006568093,0.0009311474,0.009601963,0.01427879,0.00463081,0.003981058,0.0003166995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001741479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00168085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00208939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001860907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.986737,0.006406879,0.0007932041,0.001401057,0.003804772,0.000857121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.878116,0.08639006,0.01334049,0.01203703,0.007948375,0.002168058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002721861,0.00009113649,0.01478997,0.0003168405,0.0001313849,0.0007896347,0.02163262,0.004786717,0.007012485,0.8987806,0.001338914,0.05005739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004790535,0.00007369756,0.005316139,0.0001251027,0.00006733264,0.0005255409,0.002181834,0.01301937,0.002039269,0.9714432,0.005099392,0.00006140209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5069202,0.001158329,0.3945313,0.01173887,0.0001756025,0.0001126244,0.0001024445,0.0003479416,0.08491257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865685,0.0001062592,0.01243301,0.0002107155,0.00003754084,0.00001846994,0.00002198092,0.0000468478,0.0005567424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0148508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07853943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02758750007136954,"score_gpt":0.2379653994436558,"score_spread":0.2103778993722862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}