{"id":"W778998155","doi":"","title":"Review of cases of arbitration for the Vancouver Winter Olympic Games 2010.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"journal of physical education","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Arbitration; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Advertising; Operations research; Business; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008963207,0.0008073843,0.00108397,0.011562,0.003154077,0.003951417,0.003339373,0.004469647,0.009836745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04080251,0.0009237583,0.0009217502,0.01419718,0.002440721,0.00138796,0.001245381,0.002440293,0.002341063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01555341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02886327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2358284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3958836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988955,0.00245296,0.001652468,0.000576809,0.005639527,0.0007231775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689321,0.01689364,0.00292748,0.000915022,0.009703981,0.0006277781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001066642,0.00006277145,0.001202592,0.01264527,0.0001113735,0.001221107,0.001227295,0.0002033644,0.0001556916,0.01444686,0.7255277,0.2430894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003667337,0.00002611847,0.007465687,0.01690553,0.000121255,0.001496941,0.0007300457,0.00005685529,0.0001059987,0.0009077897,0.9721199,0.00002729076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004193639,0.8784766,0.0003954594,0.00933063,0.003336652,0.0003399813,0.001506646,0.00003647086,0.102384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07100559,0.8737135,0.001211225,0.0195076,0.001460797,0.0007588872,0.003365209,0.00006041661,0.02891681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7641716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4689115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02248988436482302,"score_gpt":0.3753602733775201,"score_spread":0.3528703890126971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}