{"id":"W77936192","doi":"10.1197/jamia.m2203","title":"Systematically Assessing the Situational Relevance of Electronic Knowledge Resources: A Mixed Methods Study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","keywords":"Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Thematic analysis; Curiosity; Situational ethics; Information needs; Knowledge management; Psychology; Applied psychology; Situation awareness; Qualitative research; Medicine; Computer science; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07393889,0.00009226776,0.0004356701,0.0001660428,0.0006805664,0.00003054973,0.0007759253,0.00008996107,0.00003960797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04648587,0.00004584275,0.0001195745,0.001251115,0.0001826681,0.0002931148,0.0001305336,0.001516573,0.0000154368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001419608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003855545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007853328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001463514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99036,0.003846586,0.002538924,0.00005746118,0.002592937,0.0006040724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751267,0.01654835,0.006322248,0.0002508457,0.001477429,0.0002744324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002441032,0.001765173,0.4176521,0.001808175,0.0007466474,0.000002126399,0.3145161,0.0002194503,0.0003431743,0.002242277,0.0602343,0.2002264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001075983,0.0008307749,0.6642377,0.001113113,0.0001151827,0.00001310321,0.2998754,0.01860937,0.00003573975,0.001417852,0.01253829,0.0001374773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9512693,0.00007494293,0.04101747,0.00449428,0.0009900889,0.0005711646,0.000001008244,0.000007053035,0.00157465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930475,0.00004918266,0.005172632,0.00101528,0.000497544,0.0000121466,6.194625e-7,0.000006845769,0.0001982735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2465856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.961546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05912882270335597,"score_gpt":0.548414584962115,"score_spread":0.4892857622587591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}