{"id":"W78932006","doi":"10.3182/20100705-3-be-2011.00019","title":"Fault detection using CUSUM based techniques with application to the Tennessee Eastman Process","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFAC Proceedings Volumes","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"CUSUM; Fault detection and isolation; Process (computing); Statistical process control; Fault (geology); Engineering; Reliability engineering; Computer science; Control theory (sociology); Real-time computing; Control engineering; Control (management); Artificial intelligence; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007757583,0.0005745778,0.0005621727,0.001210064,0.0006551248,0.0006651585,0.0005468464,0.0004666307,0.0009354686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003036585,0.0001661734,0.0002800208,0.001847329,0.0003402741,0.0003995397,0.000358952,0.0005118289,0.00008069493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009704035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008118392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09219386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07252778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997172,0.00008177602,0.00001631618,0.00004055378,0.0001082555,0.00003591345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985018,0.0009443373,0.0001074141,0.00004375988,0.0003704806,0.0000323095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007837387,0.0001856159,0.01459298,0.0001764897,0.0001097975,0.001366442,0.0005043878,0.6222277,0.0120668,0.007669868,0.003496764,0.3368194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000670145,0.00004697691,0.002160698,0.000002399107,0.00001067184,0.00003733173,0.00004636604,0.9948468,0.002009943,0.0004678552,0.0003565305,0.000007637444],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5726096,0.0008641303,0.4210491,0.000485272,0.0001005585,0.0000936047,0.0002010761,0.001105177,0.00349142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9234815,0.000220808,0.07435931,0.00001975372,0.00002225995,0.00001716889,0.0001200354,0.00003994834,0.001719243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09219386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1833144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004031052360832332,"score_gpt":0.2134297650948742,"score_spread":0.2093987127340419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}