{"id":"W796029214","doi":"10.1007/s00267-015-0573-2","title":"Using Analysis of Governance to Unpack Community-Based Conservation: A Case Study from Tanzania","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Corporate governance; Devolution (biology); Revenue; Government (linguistics); Business; Community-based conservation; Environmental resource management; Public administration; Environmental planning; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Geography; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001800495,0.0002150187,0.000160175,0.00124337,0.003149334,0.001297604,0.0006064181,0.0005544674,0.001544439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003641586,0.0001723279,0.0001608971,0.001954674,0.001820206,0.0008942074,0.001443251,0.0006100045,0.00007431723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003660618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002646203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0825005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.278426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991624,0.0005031278,0.00002397765,0.00004307593,0.00006055401,0.0002068666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977394,0.001329725,0.0003820329,0.0001345539,0.0002206331,0.0001936784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002133539,0.0004523788,0.3921298,0.0004666645,0.00007708579,0.02243303,0.4620442,0.002067891,0.005901182,0.01955141,0.003363854,0.09129917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003704866,0.0002931465,0.4298977,0.0006505303,0.0001145885,0.002823279,0.5330217,0.004493353,0.001620599,0.00348714,0.02351959,0.00004135974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964046,0.0001118655,0.0006125938,0.0003822699,0.00000275983,0.00003580511,0.00003151351,0.000003480935,0.002415088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984614,0.00008270748,0.0009740398,0.00003983978,0.000001631469,0.00001354553,0.00001903716,0.000003067711,0.0004048384],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0825005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1640406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06613292196642534,"score_gpt":0.258319805697975,"score_spread":0.1921868837315497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}