{"id":"W812132959","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-18696-2_5","title":"Development of a Short and Valid Scale to Assess Consumers’ Cognitive Justifications for Not Behaving Ethically: A Canada-China Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Developments in marketing science: proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Rationalization (economics); Consumption (sociology); Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; China; Social psychology; Positive economics; Marketing; Economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Management; Social science; Law; Geography; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00859893,0.0006505557,0.0007364889,0.002690655,0.006826014,0.002080513,0.001928492,0.001173314,0.003479689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01423798,0.0007128298,0.001047446,0.003849331,0.002362827,0.001693514,0.001601783,0.00292896,0.0005980637],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02464934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07424084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9214358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.969147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971163,0.0005550756,0.0001993286,0.0002838629,0.00145108,0.0003943287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836243,0.002946703,0.000776968,0.0005582012,0.01055389,0.00153997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007757301,0.004606249,0.7899834,0.0003183906,0.0001924334,0.0004560724,0.0361866,0.0006349244,0.004748122,0.005508184,0.01566731,0.1409225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003087279,0.0007286756,0.9661247,0.0001277064,0.00009973002,0.0001015549,0.01730435,0.001631334,0.0009560606,0.0009482654,0.01155144,0.0001175523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805747,0.0003670115,0.002960132,0.0009541107,0.00008838854,0.003519352,0.001128995,0.00002951826,0.01037774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461151,0.0008308286,0.02306726,0.001108659,0.00002667744,0.005354098,0.002989797,0.00006710527,0.02044029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07856417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1788443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2954988680271224,"score_gpt":0.4449431875460468,"score_spread":0.1494443195189244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}