{"id":"W830577942","doi":"10.14249/eia.2012.21.4.525","title":"The Possibility of Investor-State Dispute under Korea US FTA in relation to Korean Environmental Impact Assessment: A Lesson from Bilcon v. Canada Case under NAFTA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Investor-state dispute settlement; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Free trade agreement; Relation (database); International trade; Political science; Business; Law; Free trade; Foreign direct investment","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001260403,0.0006348412,0.0006820593,0.0001227058,0.0004170996,0.0000840249,0.0005723307,0.0001671781,0.002526816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002264383,0.0004364851,0.0003832963,0.0002433893,0.0004856539,0.00111977,0.0006417612,0.0008290296,0.00002893743],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01259469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001966174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2154442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03820647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949042,0.0004698277,0.001509908,0.0004654986,0.001542378,0.001108195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996564,0.0003903113,0.001080762,0.0007485044,0.000003863169,0.001212505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001349573,0.001311314,0.9051282,0.000004206704,0.0001880802,0.0001160418,0.0007608424,0.02682693,0.06227968,0.000008722062,0.0009003574,0.002340685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001340218,0.0006256232,0.9923496,0.00004677815,0.00009934907,0.0004122067,0.001897022,0.0007224933,0.001262929,0.0002363616,0.0005425158,0.0004649546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970475,0.0002575982,0.0001860692,0.0005525281,0.0003350517,0.0005916238,0.0005908979,0.000007079464,0.0004316819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981679,0.0002883789,0.0007515861,0.000331137,0.0001190804,0.00001464752,0.00008203888,0.00006935802,0.0001759275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1772377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01370757540817008,"score_gpt":0.3047135169346811,"score_spread":0.291005941526511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}