{"id":"W831724490","doi":"10.6067/xcv86m369g","title":"PHYTOLITH ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FROM FT. VANCOUVER NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE, WASHINGTON","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Digital Archeological Record (tDAR)","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phytolith; Historic site; Archaeology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001369418,0.0002022837,0.0001934395,0.003474256,0.002308977,0.000853996,0.0002810005,0.0002273148,0.002560973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002148099,0.0001890095,0.0001327229,0.002898689,0.0002953652,0.0001011387,0.0002660988,0.0003086772,0.000801096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009111936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009258161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8202971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998081,0.000007783256,0.00001087241,0.00005501333,0.00007789208,0.00004035576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997261,0.00001362347,0.00001934465,0.00001432111,0.0001961204,0.00003042355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004385084,0.0001552843,0.7489572,0.0002014729,0.0001264944,0.0004851939,0.003498884,0.0001572912,0.153414,0.000238925,0.004728995,0.08759775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003717769,0.00002269667,0.9878525,0.00001419011,0.00002258207,0.000114448,0.001128847,0.00007644086,0.003635052,0.00001415853,0.007110824,0.000004650164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650794,0.0005008396,0.001129944,0.0000402797,0.0000304017,0.0001211578,0.01449812,0.000058394,0.01854159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599915,0.0006682389,0.004724069,0.000131871,0.00001653387,0.0001355205,0.01485168,0.00005678297,0.01942393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.44679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8883789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03444282985300435,"score_gpt":0.2179193487633925,"score_spread":0.1834765189103882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}