{"id":"W832645221","doi":"10.1080/00028533.2012.11821778","title":"Dialogic Potential in the Shadow of Canada's Indian Residential School System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Argumentation theory; Sociology; Negotiation; Argument (complex analysis); Injustice; Indigenous; Compromise; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Social science; Pedagogy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005622561,0.0003895366,0.0004537243,0.001840511,0.07915977,0.02424369,0.002787041,0.004648411,0.008155404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01026292,0.0003396416,0.0002948478,0.002331787,0.05232384,0.005314143,0.01122965,0.007414638,0.0004542733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1158501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1072707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.866484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9381675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932996,0.003163045,0.00008893592,0.0005785582,0.0008500626,0.002019837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923913,0.004015451,0.0003549313,0.0003401305,0.001027129,0.001871171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004350179,0.00003559154,0.00172035,0.0000652505,0.00000867593,0.001544156,0.5825626,0.0003013452,0.0003555173,0.3928397,0.009590278,0.01093302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003182471,0.00001849431,0.002475686,0.0001871729,0.00002163242,0.0002344135,0.6478179,0.0007890256,0.000533662,0.04062939,0.3071969,0.00006390333],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4888588,0.002270211,0.003328673,0.07308509,0.0004251035,0.00009620532,0.0001088835,0.0001466848,0.4316803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891869,0.0001601738,0.0003498911,0.0009100831,0.00002539284,0.0000122721,0.000007887413,0.00002134897,0.009326132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.133516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8405552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01903988630529818,"score_gpt":0.2322119849819659,"score_spread":0.2131720986766678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}