{"id":"W844775728","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/6ypuw","title":"An end to ‘God-like’ scientific knowledge? How non-anonymous referees and open review alter meanings for scientific knowledge","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Anonymity; Openness to experience; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Secrecy; Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Internet privacy; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Social psychology; Computer science; Law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1433164,0.0006287706,0.001450176,0.004349038,0.01455141,0.04082024,0.003165076,0.009835185,0.004770814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3211381,0.0009390506,0.001155276,0.004291475,0.1100566,0.04241452,0.01945993,0.01179666,0.001457252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01029503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0161277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002252846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001926176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7646453,0.1712746,0.007476834,0.01512902,0.03692152,0.004552695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5294994,0.3319727,0.04022755,0.05041638,0.03777441,0.01010965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006136088,0.00002444709,0.001296491,0.0002279698,0.000043249,0.0002317918,0.1091812,0.0001537057,0.000429353,0.8685632,0.004199784,0.01558747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005384248,0.00006576264,0.0008873327,0.0005228161,0.00005328984,0.000327918,0.0272061,0.0003407152,0.0006506307,0.8516833,0.1180847,0.0001236421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1028899,0.01640208,0.1805979,0.4249407,0.008206008,0.0003251036,0.0001872908,0.0005248885,0.2659262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484496,0.002855809,0.0175433,0.01632539,0.002700324,0.0002777821,0.00005269028,0.0002744775,0.01152059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7579386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6936453776104983,"score_gpt":0.6171817199298439,"score_spread":0.07646365768065433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}