{"id":"W84614091","doi":"","title":"A meta-analysis of mammography screening promotion.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Global Cancer Incidence and Screening","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Psychological intervention; Confidence interval; Odds ratio; Mammography; Logistic regression; Meta-analysis; Incidence (geometry); Demography; Mammography screening; Random effects model; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Nursing; Breast cancer; Cancer","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02359892,0.003678248,0.0192351,0.008226265,0.0006203552,0.002771114,0.001570613,0.002064595,0.004976323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05974112,0.001275287,0.03585972,0.006072213,0.0005117652,0.001684859,0.001213469,0.002477737,0.0004387571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002239634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003569866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004506968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008783974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9755686,0.01821062,0.002722373,0.001487993,0.001669455,0.0003410032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841771,0.01225243,0.001672677,0.0007067561,0.0009406601,0.0002502873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004742061,0.00005795115,0.003090775,0.1196162,0.8503318,0.0001399852,0.00005263886,0.0007032961,0.0002122437,0.0002163163,0.001234674,0.01960213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00156048,0.0004164294,0.002502359,0.006748454,0.9864008,0.00008592928,0.00002549359,0.0002176242,0.0001322843,0.0003268079,0.001569285,0.00001404638],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005878561,0.9884471,0.00210028,0.0006061616,0.000929013,0.0005946999,0.0008149479,0.00007216028,0.0005569585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2949278,0.6848352,0.01131916,0.001992582,0.001164323,0.003082898,0.001413867,0.00008108509,0.001183054],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02359892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1248046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.338601577166492,"score_gpt":0.3416193216710764,"score_spread":0.003017744504584474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}