{"id":"W880187778","doi":"10.31979/2151-6014(2011).020105","title":"ATMAN, IDENTITY, AND EMANATION: ARGUMENTS FOR A HINDU ENVIRONMENTAL ETHIC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Philosophy An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy","topic":"Religion, Ecology, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Brahman; Argument (complex analysis); Identity (music); Virtue; Environmental philosophy; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Religious studies; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003611831,0.0003952305,0.0003159413,0.001223595,0.007346932,0.00513896,0.001359057,0.00320547,0.00329819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002739348,0.000181049,0.0002573858,0.000919742,0.02880579,0.005341994,0.00643191,0.003240425,0.0004153514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003568569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002139843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00267688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004790768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974747,0.00165134,0.00004387287,0.0001899311,0.000345805,0.0002943232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982116,0.0008841087,0.0002701357,0.0001523733,0.0002406363,0.0002412277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009519189,0.00001335283,0.0002690427,0.00001298885,0.000001456769,0.00003745023,0.004849763,0.00003755488,0.00003511152,0.9918676,0.0004801913,0.002385945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003465128,0.00004877841,0.003618283,0.0001571613,0.00001092081,0.0002417134,0.01958429,0.0009423233,0.0004634957,0.9218971,0.05298192,0.00001944024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2571051,0.005875554,0.01396647,0.07953908,0.0007244541,0.00004689042,0.0000365075,0.0000203515,0.6426857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987417,0.0007099238,0.002078839,0.00187614,0.0001577651,0.00002584857,0.00001210867,0.000007038068,0.007715397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007346932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02589196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.408263677338212,"score_gpt":0.3964989442433956,"score_spread":0.0117647330948164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}