{"id":"W880187778","doi":"10.31979/2151-6014(2011).020105","title":"ATMAN, IDENTITY, AND EMANATION: ARGUMENTS FOR A HINDU ENVIRONMENTAL ETHIC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Philosophy An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy","topic":"Religion, Ecology, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Brahman; Argument (complex analysis); Identity (music); Virtue; Environmental philosophy; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Religious studies; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002057547,0.000281415,0.0005414547,0.00050101,0.000446626,0.00008930832,0.0009182971,0.0001251986,0.000152279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000199702,0.00028013,0.000255045,0.0001868473,0.00204082,0.00148755,0.0001846782,0.0005883783,0.000004081061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002229321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001689888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000316902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005657414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966861,0.0007831107,0.0009019981,0.00036011,0.001022024,0.000246631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973404,0.0004665523,0.001258197,0.0001650642,0.0005553517,0.0002144533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005418622,0.0006424469,0.03368415,0.00003723777,0.0008370192,0.000007368217,0.03626218,0.00001095114,0.00002547714,0.9273868,0.00004920592,0.0005153337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001664215,0.0005028801,0.03494708,0.0001052145,0.0001699821,0.00001276306,0.006717682,0.00005696225,0.0004141692,0.9541476,0.0009705217,0.0002909813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6778972,0.001079943,0.01308235,0.01182957,0.003677914,0.002024014,0.0002560259,0.00005492029,0.2900981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924201,0.0001554457,0.006030876,0.0001478678,0.001132698,0.00003678461,0.00002947034,0.00001706155,0.00002968663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.314523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.408263677338212,"score_gpt":0.3964989442433956,"score_spread":0.0117647330948164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}