{"id":"W930028063","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Kathryn J. Norlock's \"Receptivity as a virtue of (practitioners of) argumentation\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Virtue; Ambivalence; Sociology; Adversarial system; Femininity; Feeling; Affection; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Gender studies","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008225808,0.0001540739,0.0003761343,0.0001977711,0.0008813695,0.00001153971,0.0004471414,0.0002010689,0.002107794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001767977,0.0001891526,0.0001917168,0.0003966534,0.001262163,0.0007416317,0.0001696693,0.0002776623,0.0002362743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001453284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001196636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004796714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002332548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981229,0.0005510944,0.0002356471,0.0002925838,0.0005329411,0.0002647912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984217,0.0004422929,0.0004441241,0.0002833277,0.0002736934,0.000134904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001103765,0.001704416,0.7999488,0.0002390331,0.001094919,0.00003521305,0.1110579,0.00005229856,0.01005918,0.02799232,0.04265534,0.004056799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002780842,0.0009645714,0.7948443,0.000186562,0.0002448273,0.00000480481,0.165025,0.000005854038,0.008203113,0.009602842,0.01756666,0.0005706412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9434322,0.0000686283,0.00002249525,0.01424246,0.0002100325,0.000339548,0.00005054782,0.00002691075,0.04160722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995833,0.00006967669,0.0004950925,0.000719353,0.00004363489,0.00000145423,0.00002178942,0.000008080892,0.002807898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05396702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02202212996061816,"score_gpt":0.2749979137471085,"score_spread":0.2529757837864903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}