{"id":"W946614547","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.07.006","title":"Competing risk bias was common in Kaplan–Meier risk estimates published in prominent medical journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Ottawa Hospital; Alberta Innovates; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Survival analysis; Publication bias; Medicine; Relative risk; Proportional hazards model; Demography; Psychology; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8992546,0.0004086806,0.02059112,0.001200154,0.00007355562,0.0002824867,0.003467072,0.0007397369,0.005352322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9747352,0.0001790297,0.003795791,0.001493714,0.0003536863,0.0005344728,0.0003825527,0.004193368,0.0005331541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009399198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007052651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002422983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008333332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5089921,0.3493709,0.1304409,0.001450773,0.008626074,0.001119182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1131506,0.7390531,0.1368895,0.00372704,0.004050569,0.003129127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000127664,0.000226575,0.9217629,0.00001120618,0.0001892007,0.0001504232,0.0001962843,0.001793246,2.933127e-7,0.0001658864,0.04281035,0.03256599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002102616,0.0004064819,0.7983411,0.0003580141,0.0001950088,0.0003260854,0.0005653405,0.08330385,6.987124e-7,0.09545305,0.01877167,0.0001760862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9632136,0.004114566,0.006317811,0.02289402,0.001837267,0.0003344555,0.00000783197,0.000003129142,0.001277363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700639,0.00154029,0.02510387,0.002158657,0.0009793548,0.000007552144,0.000002780725,0.00001745094,0.0001261425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3958415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9362520028653889,"score_gpt":0.6896696056469209,"score_spread":0.246582397218468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}