{"id":"W951103789","doi":"10.1017/ssh.2015.28","title":"The Adversarial Politics of Fiscal Federalism: Tax Policy and the Conservative Ascendancy in Canada, 1988–2008","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science History","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Tax reform; Political economy; Tax policy; Federalism; State (computer science); Political science; Context (archaeology); Adversarial system; Economics; Direct tax; Tax revenue; Tax avoidance; Public economics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002662827,0.0002566629,0.0004617253,0.002333364,0.02495497,0.006606929,0.00145246,0.001836834,0.003062872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008474098,0.0003699065,0.0003340693,0.004357762,0.007589113,0.00131183,0.002388909,0.003727596,0.0001589557],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3315627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958798,0.0002152075,0.00005699086,0.0002535251,0.001163326,0.002431247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960546,0.0004405923,0.0004342504,0.0001020512,0.001798864,0.001169546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006298969,0.0001990979,0.2056502,0.0003151997,0.0001417526,0.00101124,0.1351583,0.003799649,0.001574037,0.4503631,0.1094203,0.09173721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004909172,0.00004248684,0.4920075,0.0002100698,0.00007813468,0.0001243266,0.09302533,0.001317381,0.001003802,0.006187813,0.4057954,0.0001586395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.821076,0.004163502,0.0004829644,0.06209769,0.0002341652,0.00008671007,0.001365429,0.00003859213,0.1104551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809925,0.001005282,0.0001648722,0.001735398,0.00002757635,0.00001311685,0.0001920671,0.00001267193,0.01585657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6684372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7752925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0179316460576084,"score_gpt":0.2782369516602429,"score_spread":0.2603053056026345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}