{"id":"W978930151","doi":"","title":"Ranking by the Rough Approximation of a Preference Relation for an Extrusion Process - a Robustness Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Silesian Digital Library (Silesian Library)","topic":"Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Ranking (information retrieval); Extrusion; Computer science; Preference relation; Rough set; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Machine learning; Preference; Statistics; Materials science; Chemistry; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001583512,0.0004146039,0.0004207676,0.0002007113,0.0003427454,0.001707414,0.002169949,0.0001606392,0.00002153824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002866496,0.0003028405,0.0001535662,0.001179177,0.00009194281,0.02610616,0.0002248404,0.0002251642,0.000005286058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001193304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001626709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001186426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.964408e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971883,0.0001628939,0.0007630848,0.0008637194,0.0005239731,0.0004980477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981347,0.0001451655,0.0004667846,0.001031364,0.0000367982,0.000185178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00115624,0.007320684,0.03122348,0.0005089662,0.00015133,0.00004405533,0.01372339,0.006728926,0.0002407796,0.1641244,0.03327319,0.7415045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007103033,0.01072626,0.114316,0.0007449002,0.0001222671,0.00008114045,0.003090766,0.4899078,0.006032227,0.3598389,0.00472572,0.003311043],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5319822,0.0005548762,0.4010942,0.004647031,0.0003021848,0.006736086,0.0004038,0.001950171,0.05232945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836164,0.000006170782,0.01488525,0.0003023559,0.0001395758,0.0001186542,0.0005290722,0.0000504752,0.000352016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7381935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02412241712935479,"score_gpt":0.2321083835854639,"score_spread":0.2079859664561091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}