{"id":"W9941716","doi":"10.20659/jfp.13.special_issue_279","title":"Stability of Surface LiDAR Height Estimates on a Point and Polygon Basis(&lt;Special Issue&gt;Silvilaser)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Planning","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; University of British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Lidar; Polygon (computer graphics); Remote sensing; Environmental science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Tree canopy; Forest inventory; Ranging; Canopy; Mathematics; Geography; Geodesy; Computer science; Forest management; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003287623,0.0001212131,0.0002426343,0.00004185163,0.0001671011,0.00001802351,0.0001280669,0.00005559358,0.0002256559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006801919,0.00009735639,0.00007212257,0.0001324407,0.0002242778,0.0001582704,0.00004674965,0.0001904812,0.00001888648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006933666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002091013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005866484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001592235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989047,0.00003736475,0.00038634,0.0001513216,0.0003466979,0.0001735951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991922,0.0001748053,0.0003153721,0.0001600708,0.00002497021,0.0001325847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004702324,0.0004181705,0.8921992,0.00003610288,0.00007063286,0.0001730597,0.006407237,0.0262853,0.04729403,0.00009192854,0.02173267,0.004821433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007822557,0.0006876046,0.9309745,0.0002069345,0.00005807467,0.0006880725,0.0003614688,0.003137809,0.0415385,0.0007292389,0.02056979,0.000265684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866828,0.00009250962,0.000219979,0.0003934291,0.00008065526,0.00007435266,0.00000651785,0.000008648557,0.01244116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907364,0.00003165788,0.008869605,0.00003976458,0.0002477136,1.226194e-7,0.000001586578,0.000009719526,0.00006340721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03877536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3970079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0158835017619912,"score_gpt":0.2410187735417626,"score_spread":0.2251352717797714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}