MétaCan
← all works

Hypertrophic scarring: the greatest unmet challenge after burn injury

2016· review· en· 706 citations· W2526166493 on OpenAlex· 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31406-4

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Classifier prediction

metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90

Predictions imitate two machine teachers. Scores are not calibrated prevalence probabilities.

Classifier candidate
Not applicable
Classifier consensus
N/A
Teacher imitation scores

Codex

Other design0.654
Not applicable0.031
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.011
Systematic review0.010
Scholarly communication0.005
Observational0.004
Open science0.003
Theoretical or conceptual0.003
Case report0.002
Meta-analysis0.002
Research integrity0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000
Randomized trial0.000
Bibliometrics0.000
Metaresearch0.000
Science and technology studies0.000
Qualitative0.000
Simulation or modelling0.000
Bench or experimental0.000

Gemma

Not applicable0.991
Systematic review0.050
Theoretical or conceptual0.003
Observational0.003
Case report0.002
Meta-analysis0.002
Metaresearch0.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000
Research integrity0.000
Bibliometrics0.000
Science and technology studies0.000
Randomized trial0.000
Open science0.000
Scholarly communication0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000
Qualitative0.000
Simulation or modelling0.000
Bench or experimental0.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread
0.274 how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Improvements in acute burn care have enabled patients to survive massive burns that would have once been fatal. Now up to 70% of patients develop hypertrophic scars after burns. The functional and psychosocial sequelae remain a major rehabilitative challenge, decreasing quality of life and delaying reintegration into society. Approaches to optimise healing potential of burn wounds use targeted wound care and surgery to minimise the development of hypertrophic scarring. Such approaches often fail…

Retrieved from the Europe PMC core record. Structured section labels are preserved when supplied.