MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

302 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
302 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 7

Labels cover 5 of 302 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 302 of 302 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Nurse turnover: A literature review – An update
Laureen Hayes, Linda O’Brien‐Pallas, Christine Duffield, Judith Shamian, James Buchan, Frances Hughes +2 more
2011· review· en· International Journal of Nursing Studies· Nursing
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
906
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Nurse turnover: A literature review
Laureen Hayes, Linda O’Brien‐Pallas, Christine Duffield, Judith Shamian, James Buchan, Frances Hughes +3 more
2005· review· en· International Journal of Nursing Studies· Nursing
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
872
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Caregiver burden—A critical discussion
Marina Bastawrous
2012· article· en· International Journal of Nursing Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
438
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Pregnancy-related anxiety: A concept analysis
Hamideh Bayrampour, Elena Ali, Deborah McNeil, Karen Benzies, Glenda MacQueen, Suzanne Tough
2015· review· en· International Journal of Nursing Studies· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
271
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Attitudes toward patient expertise in chronic illness
Sally Thorne, Kerstin Ternulf Nyhlin, Barbara Paterson
2000· article· en· International Journal of Nursing Studies· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
182
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Determinants of nurse manager job satisfaction: A systematic review
Tatiana Penconek, Kaitlyn Tate, Andréa Bernardes, Sarah Lee, Simone P.M. Micaroni, Alexandre Pazetto Balsanelli +2 more
2021· review· en· International Journal of Nursing Studies· Nursing
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
177
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Job satisfaction among critical care nurses: A systematic review
Alison Dilig-Ruiz, Ibo MacDonald, Melissa Demery Varin, Amanda Vandyk, Ian D. Graham, Janet E. Squires
2018· review· en· International Journal of Nursing Studies· Nursing
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
150
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About