MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,665 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,665 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 10 of 34

Labels cover 3 of 1,665 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,665 of 1,665 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
10.51847/HE39GD3
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
2
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Ungendering Justice
Debra Bergoffen
2013· article· en· Transitional justice review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Thinking about Law and Surveillance
Randy K. Lippert
2015· article· en· Surveillance & Society· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Law's Desire
Carl F. Stychin
2013· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
“Existing in the Hyphen”
Jennifer Hendry
2017· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Re-Imagining Equality: Meaning and Movement
Gillian Calder, Sharon Cowan
2008· article· en· Australian Feminist Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Feminist Judgments
Linda L. Berger, Bridget J. Crawford, Kathryn M. Stanchi
2018· article· en· Oñati Socio-legal Series· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundvenueunlabeled
Litigating the Carceral Soundscape
David Howes, Simcha Walfish
2023· article· en· Osgoode Hall law journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Risk, restorative justice and the Crown
Brendyn Johnson
2021· article· en· The International Journal of Restorative Justice· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About