MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 11 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Heterotic and bosonic string amplitudes via field theory
Thales Azevedo, Marco Chiodaroli, Henrik Johansson, Oliver Schlotterer
2018· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
82
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
An E 7 surprise
Tudor Dimofte, Davide Gaiotto
2012· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
82
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Boundary conditions for Kerr-AdS perturbations
Óscar J. C. Dias, Jorge E. Santos
2013· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
82
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Solving the AdS/CFT Y-system
Nikolay Gromov, Vladimir Kazakov, Sébastien Leurent, Dmytro Volin
2012· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
82
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Weakly-coupled IIA flux compactifications
Eran Palti, Gianmassimo Tasinato, John Ward
2008· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
82
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Bubbling defect CFT's
Jaume Gomis, Christian Römelsberger
2006· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
82
citations
affunlabeled
(2, 2) Scattering and the celestial torus
Alexander Atanasov, Adam Ball, Walker Melton, Ana-Maria Raclariu, Andrew Strominger
2021· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
81
citations
afffundunlabeled
Holographic Dual of Extended Black Hole Thermodynamics
Moaathe Belhaj Ahmed, Wan Cong, David Kubizňák, Robert B. Mann, Manus R. Visser
2023· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
81
citations
afffundunlabeled
Ultraspinning limits and super-entropic black holes
Robie A. Hennigar, David Kubizňák, Robert B. Mann, Nathan Musoke
2015· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
81
citations
affunlabeled
SD-brane gravity fields and rolling tachyons
2003· article· en· CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
79
citations
afffundunlabeled
Holographic Viscosity of Fundamental Matter
David Mateos, Robert C. Myers, Rowan M. Thomson
2007· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
79
citations
afffundunlabeled
Complexity Growth Rate in Lovelock Gravity
Pablo A. Cano, Robie A. Hennigar, Hugo Marrochio
2018· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
78
citations
afffundunlabeled
Black rings, boosted strings, and Gregory-Laflamme instability
Jordan Hovdebo, Robert C. Myers
2006· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
78
citations
afffundunlabeled
Higher dimensional VSI spacetimes
A. A. Coley, A. Fuster, Sigbjørn Hervik, Nicos Pelavas
2006· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
78
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Fractons in curved space
Akash Jain
2022· article· en· DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
78
citations
affunlabeled
More exact predictions of SUSYM for string theory
Gordon W. Semenoff, Konstantin Zarembo
2001· article· en· CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
78
citations
affunlabeled
A New Perspective on DGP Gravity
Ruth Gregory
2012· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
78
citations
affunlabeled
[no title]
Mathew Bullimore, Tudor Dimofte, Davide Gaiotto, Justin Hilburn, Hee‐Cheol Kim
2019· article· en· Edinburgh Research Explorer· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
78
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Factorization of Mellin amplitudes
Vasco Gonçalves, João Penedones, Emilio Trevisani
2015· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
77
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
A new perspective on DGP gravity
2007· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
77
citations
fundno affunlabeled
On the 6d origin of non-invertible symmetries in 4d
Vladimir Bashmakov, Michele Del Zotto, Azeem Hasan
2023· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
77
citations
fundno affunlabeled
T ρ σ (G) theories and their Hilbert series
Stefano Cremonesi, Amihay Hanany, Noppadol Mekareeya, Alberto Zaffaroni
2015· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
77
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Radial expansion for spinning conformal blocks
Miguel S. Costa, Tobias Hansen, João Penedones, Emilio Trevisani
2016· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
77
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About