MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

582 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
582 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 11 of 12

Labels cover 0 of 582 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 582 of 582 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Conflicting obligations in human social life
Jacob B. Hirsh, Garriy Shteynberg, Michele J. Gelfand
2020· letter· en· Behavioral and Brain Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Philosophy or science of societies?
Marion Blute
2025· article· en· Behavioral and Brain Sciences· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Two distinct concepts of knowledge
2021· article· en· Behavioral and Brain Sciences· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Infant crying in context
Elizabeth A. Job, Melanie Badali, Kenneth D. Craig
2004· article· en· Behavioral and Brain Sciences· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Neither hype nor gloom do DNNs justice
Felix A. Wichmann, Simon Kornblith, Robert Geirhos
2023· article· en· Behavioral and Brain Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Adaptive altruistic strategies
Dennis L. Krebs
2002· article· en· Behavioral and Brain Sciences· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The SOC framework and short-term memory
David J. Murray
2002· article· en· Behavioral and Brain Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Do metamers matter?
Martin E. Hahn
2003· article· en· Behavioral and Brain Sciences· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Unpacking the nudge muddle
Joseph Heath
2023· letter· en· Behavioral and Brain Sciences· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Filling-in: One or many?
Luiz Pessoa, Evan Thompson, Alva Noë
2001· article· en· Behavioral and Brain Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About