MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

807 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
807 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 12 of 17

Labels cover 2 of 807 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 807 of 807 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The Demands of Expertise
Tyler Paetkau
2023· preprint· en· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Introduction
Olivia Sultanescu
2020· article· en· Dialogue· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Duality/Conflict of Interest
2014· article· en· Canadian Journal of Diabetes· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Stanley and the Stakes Hypothesis
Michael J. Shaffer
2017· article· en· Riviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Commentary on Barron
David Hitchcock
2001· article· en· Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Of Relevance / Question d’information
2010· article· en· The Forestry Chronicle· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
The Ethics of Belief
Sylvia Nickerson
2009· article· en· Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A.I. and the Nature of Disagreement
Anthony Niblett, Albert Yoon
2024· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Judging faces on trustworthiness and emotions
Catherine Éthier-Majcher, Sven Joubert, Frédéric Gosselin
2012· article· en· Journal of Vision· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
From the Editors
Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair
2017· article· en· Informal Logic· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Cogency
Mark Vorobej
2006· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
<i>Epistemological Disjunctivism</i>
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
2016· article· en· The Philosophical Review· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Adversarial Knowledge
Reda Alhajj, Jon Rokne
2018· book-chapter· en· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Beyond finite additivity
Colin Howson
2024· article· en· Philosophy of Science· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Two-Tier Fallacy Theory
Martin Hinton, Jean H. M. Wagemans
2025· article· en· Informal Logic· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Index
Jack Martin, Jeff Sugarman, Kathleen L. Slaney
2015· paratext· en· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Lies and Misdemeanours
Joanne Soper Cook
2002· article· en· Essays on Canadian writing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
SAMPLING
Christopher W. Tindale
2007· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Introduction: Belief and Agency
David Hunter
2009· article· en· Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Trust, in So Many Words
Birgit Matthiesen
2012· article· en· Canada-United States law journal· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
What Good Are Knowledge Norms?
Daniel Munro, Jared Riggs
2025· article· en· Erkenntnis· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Introduction
Douglas Walton
2007· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Updating on the evidence of others
Richard Pettigrew, Jonathan Weisberg
2024· article· en· Philosophical Studies· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Notions of Repair and Consistent Answer
Leopoldo Bertossi
2011· book-chapter· en· Synthesis lectures on data management· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
From the Editors
Curtis Hyra
2018· article· en· Informal Logic· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Trust
2014· book-chapter· en· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About