MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,207 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,207 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 12 of 25

Labels cover 2 of 1,207 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,207 of 1,207 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Tinnitus risk factors and its evolution over time
Lise Hobeika, Matthew Fillingim, Christophe Tanguay-Sabourin, Mathieu Roy, Alain Londero, Séverine Samson +1 more
2025· article· en· Nature Communications· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Tinnitus in Canada
Pamela L Ramage-Morin, Rex Banks, Dany Pineault, Maha Atrach
2019· article· en· PubMed· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Risk Factors for Hearing Impairment in Type 1 Diabetes
Barbara H. Braffett, Gayle M. Lorenzi, Catherine C. Cowie, Xiaoyu Gao, Kathleen E. Bainbridge, Karen J. Cruickshanks +6 more
2019· article· en· Endocrine Practice· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Auditory Training in Tinnitus
Larry E. Roberts, Daniel J. Bosnyak
2010· book-chapter· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Extended mutation spectrum of Usher syndrome in Finland
Hanna Västinsalo, Reetta Jalkanen, Carsten Bergmann, Christine Neuhaus, Leenamaija Kleemola, Liisa Jauhola +2 more
2012· article· en· Acta Ophthalmologica· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Localization of septin proteins in the mouse cochlea
Atsuhiro Yoshida, Norio Yamamoto, Makoto Kinoshita, Noboru Hiroi, Takeshi Hiramoto, Gina Kang +4 more
2012· article· en· Hearing Research· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Does Subjective Tinnitus Cause Sexual Disturbance?
Nuray Bayar Muluk, Mehmed Murad Başar, Ömer Ogˇuztürk, Oğuzhan Dikici
2007· article· en· The Journal of Otolaryngology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About