MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

733 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
733 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 14 of 15

Labels cover 5 of 733 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 733 of 733 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Occurrence Download
2022· dataset· en· Global Biodiversity Information Facility· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s0029-7437(08)70406-3
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s1541-9800(09)70308-4
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affunlabeled
Identity in a Technological Society
Marc Saner, Jeremy Geelen
2015· book-chapter· en· IGI Global eBooks· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
All Humans are Humans
Roméo Dallaire
2017· article· en· Dalhousie review· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Identity in a Technological Society
Marc Saner, Jeremy Geelen
2012· book-chapter· en· IGI Global eBooks· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Cyber Medicine
Professor Reda Alhajj, Professor Jon Rokne
2014· book-chapter· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Brain-Based Addiction as an Epistemic Project
Matilda Hellman, Michael Egerer, Janne Stoneham, Sarah Forberger, Vilja Männistö-Inkinen, Doris Ochterbeck +1 more
2022· book-chapter· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Popular Representations
Matilda Hellman, Michael Egerer, Janne Stoneham, Sarah Forberger, Vilja Männistö-Inkinen, Doris Ochterbeck +1 more
2022· book-chapter· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Cyberfeminism and Artificial Life
Annette Burfoot
2006· article· en· Resources for feminist research· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Epistemic Frameworks, Science Fields and Researchers
Matilda Hellman, Michael Egerer, Janne Stoneham, Sarah Forberger, Vilja Männistö-Inkinen, Doris Ochterbeck +1 more
2022· book-chapter· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Introduction
Calvin Mercer, Tracy J. Trothen
2021· book-chapter· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Design
Alain Findeli
2010· other· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Science Fiction and Ontologies of Leadership
Jana Vizmuller-Zocco
2014· article· it· Rivista internazionale di filosofia e psicologia· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Neuroethics
Benjamin Davidson, Nir Lipsman
2024· book-chapter· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Narcissus at the Gene Pool
Ruth C. Stern
2011· article· en· Health law journal· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Thought Crime
2019· book· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Addressing uncertainties
Silke Bellanger, Aline Steinbrecher
2010· book-chapter· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Neuroscience of Ethics
Georg Northoff
2023· other· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Methods of Neuroethics
Quinn Boyle, Paul van Donkelaar, Julie Illes
2021· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About