MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,346 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,346 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 67

Labels cover 3 of 3,346 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,346 of 3,346 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Mass loss by a scalar charge in an expanding universe
Lior M. Burko, Abraham I. Harte, Eric Poisson
2002· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
45
citations
afffundgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels agree
Matter conditions for regular black holes in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>gravity
Joshua Aftergood, Andrew DeBenedictis
2014· article· lv· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
45
citations
affunlabeled
Theoretical cosmology
A. A. Coley, George Ellis
2019· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
affunlabeled
Unified superfluid dark sector
2019· article· en· MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
affunlabeled
Black holes in the Universe: Generalized Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi solutions
Changjun Gao, Xuelei Chen, You-Gen Shen, Valerio Faraoni
2011· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Superluminality in DGP
Kurt Hinterbichler, Alberto Nicolis, Massimo Porrati
2009· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
affunlabeled
B-modes and the Nature of Inflation
Daniel Baumann, Rafael A. Porto
2016· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
affunlabeled
Signature of cosmic string wakes in the CMB polarization
Rebecca J. Danos, Robert Brandenberger, G. P. Holder
2010· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
afffundunlabeled
Ekpyrotic cosmology with a zero-shear S-brane
Robert Brandenberger, Ziwei Wang
2020· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Hydrodynamic gradient expansion in linear response theory
Michał P. Heller, Alexandre Serantes, Michał Spaliński, Viktor Svensson, Benjamin Withers
2021· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
afffundunlabeled
Emergent cosmology from matrix theory
Suddhasattwa Brahma, Robert Brandenberger, Samuel Laliberte
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
affunlabeled
Role of evaporation in gravitational collapse
Robert B. Mann, Daniel R. Terno
2018· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
afffundunlabeled
Affleck-Dine inflation
James M. Cline, Matteo Puel, Takashi Toma
2020· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About