MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,510 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,510 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 31

Labels cover 96 of 1,510 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,510 of 1,510 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundno abstractunlabeled
Measuring multimorbidity series. An overlooked complexity - Comparison of self-report vs. administrative data in community-living adults: Paper 3. Agreement across data sources and implications for estimating associations with health service use
Andrea Gruneir, Lauren E. Griffith, Kathryn Fisher, Lindsay Favotto, Christopher Patterson, Maureen Markle‐Reid +2 more
2020· article· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
The role of scoping reviews in guideline development
Danielle Pollock, Hanan Khalil, Catrin Evans, Christina Godfrey, Dawid Pieper, Lyndsay Alexander +14 more
2024· editorial· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
22
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
The Cooperative Familial Registry for Breast Cancer Studies
Heather J. Sutherland, Jeanie Lacroix, Julia A. Knight, Irene L. Andrulis, Norman F. Boyd, the Ontario Cancer Genetics Network
2001· article· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Research Integrity definitions and challenges
Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, Kelly D. Cobey, David Moher
2024· article· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
21
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadgpt · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadmodels split
Abbreviated and comprehensive literature searches led to identical or very similar effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study
Hannah Ewald, Irma Klerings, Gernot Wagner, Thomas L. Heise, Andreea Dobrescu, Susan Armijo‐Olivo +6 more
2020· review· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch
20
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About