MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 18 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
No-go theorem for horizon-shielded self-tuning singularities
James M. Cline, Hassan Firouzjahi
2002· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
affunlabeled
Finite size giant magnon
Bojan Ramadanovic, Gordon W. Semenoff
2009· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
afffundunlabeled
Phases of scrambling in eigenstates
2019· article· en· SciPost Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Perturbative Corrections to Kähler Moduli Spaces
James Halverson, Hans Jockers, Joshua M. Lapan, David R. Morrison
2014· article· en· Communications in Mathematical Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
afffundunlabeled
Witten diagrams for torus conformal blocks
Per Kraus, Alexander Maloney, Henry Maxfield, Gim Seng Ng, Jie-qiang Wu
2017· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Hawking’s Local Rigidity Theorem Without Analyticity
Spyros Alexakis, Alexandru D. Ionescu, Sergiù Klainerman
2010· article· en· Geometric and Functional Analysis· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
affunlabeled
Entwinement in discretely gauged theories
Vijay Balasubramanian, Alice Bernamonti, Ben Craps, Tim De Jonckheere, Federico Galli
2016· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
48
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Precision calculation of 1/4-BPS Wilson loops in AdS5×S5
Валентина Форини, Valentina Giangreco M. Puletti, Luca Griguolo, Domenico Seminara, Edoardo Vescovi
2016· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
48
citations
affunlabeled
Vector volume and black holes
William Ballik, Kayll Lake
2013· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
48
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Rotating black holes in a Gödel universe
Dominic Brecher, Ulf Danielsson, James P Gregory, Martin E Olsson
2003· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
48
citations
afffundunlabeled
NUTs and bolts beyond Lovelock
Pablo Bueno, Pablo A. Cano, Robie A. Hennigar, Robert B. Mann
2018· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
48
citations
affunlabeled
Gravitational collapse in gravity's rainbow
2015· article· en· International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
New multiply nutty spacetimes
Robert B. Mann, Cristian Stelea
2006· article· en· Physics Letters B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
affunlabeled
Decoherence without dissipation
2012· article· en· Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
afffundunlabeled
Tailoring non-compact spin chains
Pedro Vieira, Tianheng Wang
2014· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About